Theoretical and Density Functional Theory (DFT) studies for the organic compound: 2-Amino-6-chloro-N-methylbenzamide

 

Amir Lashgari, Shahriar Ghammamy, Masomeh Shahsavari*

Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: Ikiu2014@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

In this paper, the optimized geometries and frequencies of the stationary point and the minimum-energy paths of C8H9ClN2O are calculated by using the DFT (B3LYP) methods with LANL2DZ basis sets. B3LYP/ LANL2DZ calculation results indicated that some selected bond length and bond angles values for the C8H9ClN2O.

 

KEYWORDS: C8H9ClN2O, LUMO and HOMO, DFT, bond angles, bond length.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

In the title compound, C8H9ClN2O, the dihedral angle between the benzene ring and the methylamide substituent is 68.39 (11)°. In the crystal, molecules are linked by N--- H...O hydrogen bonds, forming layers parallel to the ab plane. Anthranilamide-based derivatives exhibit interesting biological activities such as antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, antimalarial and insecticidal activities. We report here the crystal structure of the title compound, 2-amino-6-chloro-JV-methylbenzamide, and an important organic intermediate in the synthesis of medicines, agricultural chemicals and animal drugs. In the title compound. The dihedral angle formed by the benzene ring and the methylamide substituent (r.m.s. deviation 0.0065 A) is 68.39 (11)°. In the crystal structure molecules are connected via N---H...O hydrogen bonds (Table 1) into layers running parallel to the ab plane, [1-10]. During this study we report the optimized geometries, assignments and electronic structure calculations for the compound. The structure of the compound has been optimized by using the DFT (B3LYP) method with the LANL2DZ basis sets, using the Gaussian 98 program [11]. The comparison between theory and experiment is made. Density functional theory methods were employed to determine the optimized structures of C8H9ClN2O and Initial calculations were performed at the DFT level and split- valence plus polarization LANL2DZ basis sets were used. Local minima were obtained by full geometrical optimization have all positive frequencies [12].

 

METHODS:

All computational are carried out using Gaussian 98 program[13]. The optimized structural parameters were used in the vibrational frequency calculations at DFT levels to characterize all stationary points as minima. Harmonic vibrational frequencies (i) in cm-1 and infrared intensities (int) in Kilometer per mole of all compounds were performed at the same level on the respective fully optimized geometries. Energy minimum molecular geometries were located by minimizing energy, with respect to all geometrical coordinates without imposing any symmetrical constraints.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

Molecular properties

The structures of compounds are shown in Figure 1. All calculations were carried out using the computer program Gaussian 98. Theoretical calculation of bond and angle for the compound was determined by optimizing the geometry (Table 1).

 

NBO Analysis in Table1 and The NBO Calculated Hybridizations are reported in Table2. We could not compare the calculation results given in bond lengths and bond angle values with the experimental data. Because the crystal structure of the title compound is not available till now. Amides are far less basic than amines because the nonbonded electron pair of nitrogen is much less available, a consequence of electron withdrawal by the carbonyl group. Amides are no more basic than water or alcohols. Amides undergo acidic or basic hydrolysis to the corresponding carboxylic acid and amine or ammonia. The basic reaction produces the carboxylate salt, whereas the acidic reaction produces the amine salt.

 

Table 1: Geometrical parameters optimized for C8H9ClN2O some selected bond lengths (A) and angles (°C)

Method

 

B3LYP/ LANL2DZ

C8H9ClN2O

Lengths (Å)

Bond

Lengths (Å)

Bond

 

 

 

 

1.8329

C6-Cl10

1.4366

C1-C2

3.2832

Cl10-C18

1.4085

C1-C6

3.1851

Cl10-H20

1.5048

C1-C14

1.0146

N11-H12

1.4215

C2-C3

1.0092

N11-H13

1.3846

C2-N11

1.272

C14-O15

1.3980

C3-C4

1.3724

C14-N16

1.0887

C3-H7

1.0165

N16-H17

1.4104

C4-C5

1.4673

N16-C18

1.0871

C4-H8

1.0974

C18-H19

1.3984

C5-C6

1.0923

C18-H20

1.0837

C5-H9

 

Bond angles (°)

 

Bond angles (°)

116.2311

C5-C6- Cl10

117.4591

C2-C1- C6

75.1048

C6-Cl10- C18

117.3564

C2-C1- C14

60.604

C6- Cl10- H20

125.1218

C6-C1- C14

118.5144

C2- N11- H12

119.1061

C1-C2- C3

119.583

C2- N11- H13

120.5655

C1-C2- N11

119.228

H12-N11- H13

120.3205

C3-C2- N11

120.5258

C1-C14- O15

120.7711

C2-C3- C4

119.7196

C1-C14- N16

119.0466

C2-C3-H7

119.598

O15-C14- N16

120.1564

C4-C3-H7

113.0635

C14-N16- H17

120.8974

C3-C4- C5

129.3115

C14-N16- C18

119.723

C3-C4- H8

117.3721

H17-N16- C18

119.3491

C5-C4- H8

77.6608

Cl10-C18- N16

117.8042

C4-C5- C6

169.7624

Cl10-C18- H19

121.4858

C4-C5- H9

60.8361

Cl10-C18- H21

120.7033

C6-C5- H9

109.3322

N16-C18- H19

123.6255

C1-C6- C5

110.1331

N16-C18- H20

120.0723

C1-C6- Cl10

 

Fig. 1: The schematic structure of the C8H9ClN2O.

 

NBO study on structures

Natural Bond Orbital's (NBOs) are localized few-center orbital's that describe the Lewis-like molecular bonding pattern of electron pairs in optimally compact form. More precisely, NBOs are an orthonormal set of localized "maximum occupancy" orbital's whose leading N/2 members (or N members in the open-shell case) give the most accurate possible Lewis-like description of the total N-electron density. This analysis is carried out by examining all possible interactions between "filled" (donor) Lewis-type NBOs and "empty" (acceptor) non-Lewis NBOs, and estimating their energetic importance by 2nd-order perturbation theory. Since these interactions lead to donation of occupancy from the localized NBOs of the idealized Lewis structure into the empty non-Lewis orbitals (and thus, to departures from the idealized Lewis structure description), they are referred to as "delocalization" corrections to the zeroth-order natural Lewis structure. Natural charges have been computed using natural bond orbital (NBO) module implemented in Gaussian 98.

 


 

Table 2: The NBO Calculated Hybridizations for (C8H9ClN2O), B3LYP/LANL2DZ.

B3LYP

Atom No.

Bond

B3LYP

Atom No.

Bond

 

 

 

 

 

 

S1P1.72,S1P1.64

C1-C2

C-C

S1P1.74,S1P1.80

C1-C6

C-C

S1P2.76,S1P2.12

C1-N11

C-N

S1P1.85,S1P1.28

C2-C3

C-C

S1P2.69,S1P1.57

C2-C14

C-C

S1P1.48,S1P1.77

C3-C4

C-C

S1P1.77,S1P1.81

C4-C5

C-C

S1P2.59,S1

C4-H7

C-H

S1P1.82,S1P1.84

C5-C6

C-C

S1P2.48,S1

C5-H8

C-H

S1P2.48,S1

C6-H9

C-H

S1P0.84,S1

CI10-H20

CI-H

S1P2.98,S1

N11-H12

N-H

S1P3.11,S1

N11-H13

N-H

S1P2.15,S1P1.77

C14-O15

C-O

S1P2.41,S1P2.38

C14-N16

C-N

S1P2.79,S1

N16-H17

N-H

S1P2.82,S1P2.38

N16-C18

N-C

S1P2.16

C18-H19

C-H

S1P3.54,S1

C18-H21

C-H

S1P0.00

C1

C

S1P0.00

C2

C

S1P0.00

C3

C

S1P0.00

C4

C

S1P0.00

C5

C

S1P0.00

C6

C

S1P0.00

N11

N

S1P0.00

C14

C

S1P0.00

O15

O

S1P0.00

N16

N

S1P0.00

C18

C

S1P0.00

CI10

CI

 


 

The NBO Calculated Hybridizations are significant parameters for our investigation. These quantities are derived from the NBO population analysis. The former provides an orbital picture that is closer to the classical Lewis structure. The NBO analysis involving hybridizations of selected bonds are calculated at B3LYP methods and LANL2DZ level of theory (Table 2).

 

These data shows the hyper conjugation of electrons between ligand atoms with central metal atom. The NBO calculated hybridization for C8H9ClN2O shows that all of complexes have Spx hybridization and non-planar configurations. The total hybridization of these molecules are Spx that confirmed by structural. The amount of bond hybridization showed the in equality between central atoms angles (Table 2) Shown distortion from octahedral and VSEPR structural and confirmed deviation from VSEPR structures. Second order perturbation theory analysis of Fock matrix in NBO basis for C9H11Cl2NO3 show in Table 3.

 

Frontier molecular orbital

Both the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) are the main orbital take part in chemical stability. The HOMO represents the ability to donate an electron, LUMO as an electron acceptor represents the ability to obtain an electron. The HOMO and LUMO energy were calculated by B3LYP/ LANL2DZ method [14]. This electronic absorption corresponds to the transition from the ground to the first excited state and is mainly described by one electron excitation from the highest occupied molecular or orbital (LUMO). Therefore, while the energy of the HOMO is directly related to the ionization potential, LUMO energy is directly related to the electron affinity. Energy difference between HOMO and LUMO orbital is called as energy gap that is an important stability for structures. In addition, 3D plots of highest occupied molecular orbitals (HOMOs) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals (LUMOs) are shown in Figure 2. The HOMO-LUMO energies were also calculated at the LANL2DZ and the values are listed in Figure 2, respectively.

 

Fig. 2: The atomic orbital of the frontier molecular orbital for C8H9ClN2O B3LYP/LANL2DZ level of theory.

 

 


Table 3: Second order perturbation theory analysis of Fock matrix in NBO basis for C8H9ClN2O means energy of hyper conjugative interaction (stabilization energy); b Energy difference between donor and acceptor i and j NBO orbital's; c F(i, j) is the Fock matrix element between i and j NBO.

Donor (i)

Type

ED/e

Acceptor (j)

Type

ED/e

E(2) a(KJ/mol)

E(j) E(i) b(a.u)

F(i,j)c (a.u)

C1-C2

σ

1.96383

C11-C6

 

σ*

0.02847

2.37

1.25

0.049

C2-C3

σ

1.97269

CI10-C18

σ*

0.390841

1.19

0.78

0.30

 

C3-C4

σ

1.97591

CI10-H18

σ*

0.390841

 

3.03

0.77

0.048

 

C4-C5

σ

1.97873

CI10-H20

σ*

0.14216

1.98

6.65

0.106

 

C6-H9

σ

1.97557

C1-N11

σ*

0.02743

0.62

0.86

0.021

 

CI10-H20

σ

1.91553

N16-C18

σ*

0.04647

0.94

1.38

0.032

 

N16-H17

σ

1.96357

CI10-C18

σ*

0.39084

4.57

0.75

0.058

 

N16

n

1.83128

CI10-C18

σ*

0.39084

2.63

0.41

0.031

 

O15

n

1.97510

N16-C18

σ*

0.04674

0.72

0.47

0.017

 

N11

n

1.92751

C14-O15

σ*

0.01501

0.53

0.76

0.018

CI10

σ

1.96556

N16-C18

σ*

O.4674

3.88

0.82

0.051

 

 


CONCLUSION:

In this research we are interested in studying on two Halo Organic Compounds was chosen to theoretical studies. In this paper, the optimized geometries and frequencies of the stationary point and the minimum-energy paths are calculated by using the DFT (B3LYP) methods with LANL2DZ basis sets. B3LYP/ LANL2DZ calculation results indicated that some selected bond length and bond angles values for the C8H9ClN2O.

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:

The authors wish to express their warm thanks to Dr. Ghammamy for his valuable discussions and Imam Khomeini International University, for their assistance.

 

REFERENCE:

1.        Bharate, SB, Yadav RR, Khan SI, Tekwani BL, Jacob MR, Khan IA and Vishwakarma RA. Med. Chem. Commun.4; 2013: 1042-1048.

2.        Coppola GM. Synthesis. 7; 1980: 505-536.

3.        Gnamm, C, Jeanguenat A, Dutton AC, Grimm C, Kloer DP and Crossthwaite AJ., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22; 2012: 3800–3806.

4.        Lahm, GP, Selby TP, Freudenberger JH, Stevenson TM, Myers BJ, Seburyamo G, Smith BK, Flexner L, Clark CE and Cordova D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15; 2005: 4898-4906.

5.        Macrae, CF, Edgington PR, McCabe P, Pidcock E, Shields GP, Taylor R, Towler M and Van De Streek J. J. Appl. Cryst. 39; 2006: 453-457.

6.        Norman, MH, Rigdon GC, Hall WR and Navas F. J. Med. Chem. 39; 1996: 1172-1188.

7.        Rigaku, CrystalClear. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan, 2007.

8.        Roe, M, Folkes A, Ashworth P, Brumwell J, Chima L, Hunjan S, Pretswell I, Dangerfield W, Ryder H and Charlton P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 9; 1999: 595-600.

9.        Sheldrick GM. Acta Cryst. A64; 2008: 112-122.

10.     Witt A and Bergman J. Tetrahedron. 56; 2000: 7245-7253.

11.     Smith, MC, Ciao Y, Wang H and George SJ. Coucouvanis D, Koutmos M,Sturhahn W, Alp EA, Zhao J, Kramer Sp Normal-Mode Analysis of FeCl4- and Fe2S2Cl42- via Vibrational Mossbauer, Resonance Raman, and FT-IR Spectroscopies. Inorg. Chem, 44; 2005: 5562-5570.

12.     Vrajmasu, VV, Mu'nck E and Bominaar EL. Theoretical Analysis of the Jahn"Teller Distortions in Tetrathiolato Iron (II) Complexes. inorg. Chem. 43; 2004: 4862-4866.

13.     Ghammamy, Sh, Mehrani K, Rostamzadehmansor S and Sahebalzamani H. Density functional theory studies on the structure, vibrational spectra of three new tetrahalogenoferrate (III) complexes. Natural Science. 3; 2011: 683-688.

14.     Frisch MJ and Trucks GW, et al. GASSIAN 98 (Revision A. 3) Gaussian Inc. 1998.

 

 

 

Received on 02.05.2014          Modified on 25.05.2014

Accepted on 01.06.2014         © AJRC All right reserved

Asian J. Research Chem. 7(7): July 2014; Page 677-680